LGI home Major initiatives Publications Countries and regions LGI Forum and mailing lists On-line resources Contact info Search LGI site Chronology of major news and announcements
 

LGI / Resources / Ethnic relations / Social exclusion in the education

Continued

D, Conferences, seminars visited:

Romas in CEE, England, and organizer: European Dialogue, Peterburgh, UK, June 1998

Paper titled: The chances of Intercultural Education in Hungary from a Foundation Point of view, - speaker

Intercultural Education in the context of Human Rights, international conference, Budapest, 3-4 December, 1998 organizer, speaker

The mid-term Strategy of the Government of the increasement of the situation of Romas

Budapest, 11, December 1998, participant

Conference on the evaluation of the Soros Foundation Roma Program, Pécs, 14-15 January, 1999 , participant

International Meeting, Teachers for tolerance and Cultural Pluralism, Prague, 11-13 February, 1999,Paper titeled: Schools initiatives in Hungary for cultural pluralism,speaker

The chances of Multicultural Education,Senat,14. May 1999, Prague, participant

17th International Training Session on Human Rights and Peace Education 11-17,July,1999, Genova, organizer CIFEDHOP,paricipant (From other sources, but relates to the research topic(

Koszeg Summer University, Hannibal at the portas, lecturer „ the relevance of Human Rights education in CEE, 2-5, August,1999

E, Other activities related to the project:

Printing preparation of the Amnesty International manual for teachers, Title: First Steps in Teaching Human Rights.Published 14th of September 1999. Supported by the UNCHR, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

 

Editing a publication titled: Intercultural Education in CEE, will be published in November.1999. The book consist from lectures and case studies were presented on the conference with the same title in 3-4,1998 December. Supported by the KulturKontakt Austria, Hungarian Ministry of Education, European Connections Department

August- September libary work.

Topics of the relating literature:

  • Poverty and social exclusion,
  • Selection and discrimination,
  • Sociological surveys on Education: the relationship of poverty and the choosing of
  • schooling, the relationship of learning and social background, the situation of Roma pupils in education, cultural transmittance and the process of social integration,
  • European documents and declarations about national or ethnical rights, the rights of religion and to language, Children Rights and Human Rights
  • Intercultural and Multicultural Education
  • Hungarian and Czech legislation on the changes of educational legislation and on Ethnic and Minority Rights

Methodology:

As it was stated before the chosen method to be followed was making case studies and structured interviews, which I completed with the method of circle discussions( In Hungary only. In the Czech Republic language was a barrier to use this method. I chose this method to get beyond the statistical data and to have deeper understanding of the nature of exclusion, and the nature of the initiatives taken.

Discussion Circles (study circles)

The idea of the study circle is rooted in the civic movements of 19Th century America, and is based on small group discussions (5-20 people) of common concerns and difficult issues. During the discussions of such kind cooperation and participation are stressed so that the group can capitalize on the experience of all its members. The group works through difficult issues concerning the choices the society or a given organization is facing. The study circles seek common ground.

I find this method extremely useful in gathering information about the nature of everyday difficulties in schools, how these are dealt with, and about the way of thinking demonstrated in the initiatives already introduced. Based on feedback, this method also gives new ideas and a better understanding for the participants. In most of the places I was able to organize Discussion Circles with the participation of not only the teachers and the school directors, but the members of some institutions that are connected to the school (family helping centers, local government representatives, minority self government representatives). In case this was not possible to arrange, I tried to contact the members of the appropriate institutions separately. In most cases some members of the school staff were representatives of the local government as well.

Structured interviews

Beside the discussion circles I made interviews with the teachers and school directors, and the representatives of the local governments. Where it was possible I interviewed the leaders of the given minority self governments and the members of some institutions related to the schools. Although a few case studies does not enable me to make generally valid statements about the processes in the education system, but can provide information about the nature of the problem, that could be useful for other schools also. The structured interviews in the schools focused on the following questions:

ˇ What kind of problems are met / defined in the everyday practice,

ˇ What kind of initiatives are taken in reaction to the defined problems,

ˇ Who is the target of these initiatives / programs,

ˇ What kind of resources they have, what kind of resources they would need,

ˇ What are the chances of the students in the future like?

ˇ How is the multiethnicism dealt with?

ˇ Have the teachers introduced new elements in the curricula in the last years and if so in which fields,

ˇ What help is received or needed from NGO's and from the state,

ˇ What policy changes would be welcomed?

The following information was gathered about the students of each school:

ˇ The number of the students

ˇ Who is considered to be disadvantaged in the schools?

ˇ The number of Roma students

ˇ The type of helping institutions / professionals they are in contact with (state institutions, family helping centers, children’s welfare services and local governments) and the nature of their co-operation

Along the case studies conducted in the schools I made background interviews with professionals working in the field of education and with representatives of civil organizations. Concerning the civil organizations I was especially anxious to know where and by what kind of programs they are able to help the work of the school.

9.A Publication and other results

Projects

Based on the experiences in the schools visited I have developed and already began a few projects on helping schools develop their pedagogical programs and a better relation with the community.

  • The objectives of the CLAP project financed by the European Union are the following: (submitted)
  • Strengthening intercultural relations in the settlement through co-operation on common issues,
  • Providing methodological help for teachers and developing intercultural curricula in the school, and a better integration of the school in the community,
  • Enhancing the connection of the parent and the teacher to the school,
  • Developing communication among local social partners,
  • The publication of a manual of games for teachers, in order to publishe the achievements of the project.

Hejokeresztúr is a village located in the North-Eastern part of Hungary. It is in connection with two other locations, Szalonta and Szakáld. These three settlements have one common primary school. Hejokeresztúr is inhabited by 1150 people, in the two villages connected live another 1200. Those in employment live off agriculture.In these villages the Romas live in houses without infrastructure. They do not have primary education and mainly support themselves by social aid. The oldest person in the Roma community is 50 years old. The mortality rate among Romas is very high due to bad health and social conditions.

33-35% of the 259 students in the school come from the Roma settlement. There are 17 teachers. Only 5% of the students continue their studies in secondary schooling, others go to skilled labor schools.

The school is owned by the local governments of the three villages.

The teachers are strongly committed to make school and community life better.

The problems of this school are excellent examples of the difficulties that schools in disadvantaged areas in Hungary are faced with. The syndrome of ‘white flight’ for example, a form of social exclusion.

  • In co-operation with the ERRC and the UNICEF and with the involvement of three EEC countries, we are in the preparatory phase of building up a project on the integration of Roma children in the main stream education. The coordination of the training is our responsibility.( in process, not finalized yet)
  • We have applied to the United States Peace Institute with a project called ‘Peace Bus’.(The decission will be made in January 2000)

The Peace Bus is a mobile team of the trainers of our Foundation and the actors, including a professional psychiatrist, social workers and psychologists, of a Playback Theater. The incorporation of the theater group brings new approaches to conflict prevention, building confidence and strengthening relations between different nationalities and ethnic groups.

In order to raise the awareness of the community in the issues of peace and human rights, the performances of the theater are followed by a "moving exhibition" showing films and documents on human rights and peace education, and promoting the human rights documents and leaflets of Hungarian and international NGO’s.

Within the framework of this project, teachers and students of the local schools will participate in a training program and will become familiar with the concepts of human rights, peace education, conflict resolution and the school initiatives existing in the region.

  • On the 3-4th of December 1999 with the support of KulturKontakt-Austria ( Submitted) I organize a project preparatory meeting with the participation of 7 Eastern Central European NGO leaders and experts in the field of education. The title of the project planned is "What we know about each other". This project also involves the collection of school initiatives strengthening multi-ethnic communities. Our further objectives are to raise the attention of the founders to supporting various programs in this field. Some connections with the Hungarian Socrates Program are already established.

The objectives of the meeting are:

  • To plan a survey of primary school books examining how and in what context the different nationalities appear in the different subjects.
  • To strengthen intercultural education in the region by learning more about our neighbors.

Conferences

Teachers for Tolerance, 21-22nd January 2000, Prague – presentation of the current research findings.

Publication

The book of ‘Intercultural Education in the CEE’ is to be published at the end of November 1999. This book supported by Kultur-kontakt-Austria and the Hungarian Ministry of Education European Connections Department will contain the lectures and case studies presented at the conference of the same title in 3-4th December 1998. The publication is prepared both in English and Hungarian and will be distributed among partner schools and institutions of the CEE.

The Libary of the Hungarian Human Rights Information Service asked a copy from the publication. They expressed their interest to publish it in the Fundamentum quarterly journal, next year ( I want to rewrite the findings for suitable to their style, it will be published in Hungarian, and I am ready to send the copy when it is ready)

Stephan P Osborne, the professor of the Public Service Management department of Aston Business School, Birmingham is interested in publishing the research outcomes in the Research Paper series. I already had a publication in this series under the number of RP9712. I still work on it and ready to send a copy to the RSS office.

Data Base

My research will be available on the web page (/ethnic)on managing multiethnic communities of the Local Government Initiatives Program of OSI, Budapest. (contact person: Perta Kovács, submitted, but I still work on the case studies as it has to be adjusted to their requirements)

10. Detailed Summary of the findings

Social exclusion in the education system

How can the schools in disadvantaged areas of Hungary can provide better chances for their students in the age of globalization

Preface

The children of groups living on the periphery of society have disadvantage in school as well. The reverse of this statement is also true: those for who school was equal to failure experience difficulties in the community that may lead to unstable social status. These people have a greater chance of becoming dependent of the system of social aid than to evolve into responsible citizens enforcing their democratic rights. The free choice of school, and the freedom of founding new schools mean the break of the monopoly of the state, and are often related to the concept of pluralism. The questions of how the schools are dealing with social and cultural diversity, and to what extent the system allows pluralism affect culture and education has to be answered. The above dilemma may be solved according the values. Such equality, fairness and dignity mean the effectivation of human rights.

One important role of the different politics is to establish conditions in which everyone can practice their negative rights of freedom (human and citizen rights) and political rights. These rights seem to be commonly accepted also as the conditions of joining the European Union. The Human Rights of the UN has been accepted on the 10th of December 1948. The human rights are the pillars of justice, freedom and peace. I examine the appearance and enforcement of these rights and values among primary school students in Hungary and the Czech Republic.

The research aims to investigate to what extent do the everyday practice of school and the formation of rights enhance or hinder the actual practice and enforcement of the abstract concepts – such as freedom, tolerance, justice, equality - formulated in the human rights, and the process of exclusion from the community.

1. Integration and exclusion

In the society a distinction is often made between the ideas of the so-called system integration and social integration. (Lockwood, 1963) In simple terms, system integration involves impersonal powers (market mechanism, institutions, legal system, and mass communication), that hold together the society and with which the members of the society need to conform. (The remarks cited above are probably the results of this rule of adaptation and the powerless dependence on these large-scale processes.) The key words of social integration are personal communication, culture, ethics and socialization. To put it simply, one might speak about integration in case these two work together and are able to regenerate without any major disorders. On the other hand, disintegration occurs when the sub-systems are not hold together by the fabric of norms and values. Perfectly integrated society does not exist. Integration supposes norms, principles, and values that are able to hold together a society. (In regard to Europe democracy is one of the key principles of this process. Democracy that is not only a social structure, but means the acceptance of values such as Equality, or values stated in the Human Rights, Children Rights, Minority Rights etc.)

Segregation and discrimination that can lead to exclusion are considered to be the opposites of integration. The term exclusion has two main meanings: the act of expelling someone from a place where he formerly belonged or depriving that person/group of certain rights, by keeping him outside, denying access. In other words the victim of exclusion – the outcast – is "cast out" or "refused acceptance".

Therefore, the term refers to certain people/groups who are excluded from the different areas (economy related areas, institutions, etc.), attitudes and values prevalent in society. The definition of these people/groups, who have relatively or objectively bad opportunities in the society (the unemployed, those of low educational level, the poor, minorities, and women…) with the term of " inadequacy" in comparison with the average, the norm is to be avoided. Talking about them only, instead of the conflicts and mechanism that lead to their exclusion, would also be a mistake.

According to the definition of the Council of Europe: "Social exclusion can be analyzed in terms of denial –or non realization – of social rights…". Exclusion may have a number of degrees: restricted access, denial of access or multiple and persistent deprivation of the rights and advantages more often than not leading to infringement of freedoms. The European Union definition refers quite explicitly to the so-called "social rights". Returning to the distinction and debate which marked the early stages of modern social policies, exclusion is not only defined in terms of rights of "freedoms", but covers rights in terms of "claims", which cannot be guaranteed without the intervention of the state or public authorities. Intervention doesn’t only mean the declaration of rights. Initiatives targeted at people either deprived of their rights or threatened by the loss of their rights obviously can not be confined to affirming the rights of individuals, or to setting forth the rights for the most disadvantaged. The fact and the process of exclusion is closely related to the ability of representing one's interests and capabilities (Sen,1985,a,b). As many authors have pointed out, the reduction of exclusion needs the declaration and implementation of rights, ensuring the access to the rights on various levels.

The report of the International Committee led by Jacques Delors states the following. "Amidst the critical problems of social relations, education has the difficult role to create out of diversity the positive aspects of mutual understanding among people and groups. Most importantly, it has to provide everyone the means of becoming a responsible and active citizen, a goal that can be realized only in democracy." This is why I believe it is important to investigate the conditions and aims are expressed in the law, the possibilities provided for children, and how these appear in practice in the school.

The school as a social institution can help the integration of certain groups, but at the same time could enhance the processes of disintegration as well. Making large-scale changes in the processes on the macro level is not the responsibility of the school. The schools have the choice to give in and contribute to the regeneration of disintegration, or to seek the means by which they are able to develop their own system, thus (as examples demonstrate) developing the opportunities of the social group/class of their students. Of course, it is not adequate to study these strategies of survival solely on institutional level.

2. An excluded group – Romas in Hungary and the Czech Republic

2/A Social characteristics of the transition concerning the situation of Romas:

The Roma are present in all the countries of the region and constitute around 5 -10 % of their population. During the last 10 years of the so called socialist period, radical changes have occurred in the life of the Roma.

The extensive economic development needed a lot of unskilled labor force and a lot of Romas were forced to enter the main stream of economy – with the lowest level of skills - for the lowest income. This forced action has had a very serious repercussion on the social, and cultural structure of the Roma community as it was the first time in history that they have been put in a situation, where a regular monthly income, social security and medical care became their lot. As a result, their state of being outside has changed into a situation of being inside the community, despite the fact that they have remained on the lowest social level, still experiencing discrimination and exclusion.

When the transition started in 1990 with the introduction of market economy, the Roma work force became redundant. Today the Roma constitute the overwhelming part of the unemployed in these countries. Their survival is based on the meager allowances they receive from the social security system which in some cases is complemented by some income from odd jobs. The tension however is at a constant growth.. Some hundred of Roma families from Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Hungary went to Canada in the Summer, and to England in the Autumn of 1997, asking for political asylum. The influx to Canada and Britain brought the issue to the attention of both the political representatives and the general public, and has led to the increased the expression of negative feelings and attitudes towards Roma in the media.

The freedom of expression, a characteristic trait of the new democracy, has had adverse effects as well. The hate speech against the Roma, something one couldn’t – at least openly - do in the previous regime has now appeared in the media of the region.

Political instability, economic crises, the weakened authority of the state, and the growing right wing tendencies based on the revival of nationalism fueled numerous cases of racially motivated violence and blaming. The violence and the exodus have drawn the attention of national and international authorities to the problem. Granting equality and the enforcement of human rights are among the basic conditions of joining the European Union. Quoting Vaclav Havel "the success of the battle in the Czech Republic (and in the other countries of Central-Easter Europe) for the equal human rights of gypsies could be the measure of democratization."

2/B Legal position and chances

The rights granted for the Roma can be divided into two different, but related groups: the rights against discrimination and minority rights. All of the important laws, the Constitution, the Law of Education, and the Code of Work include the right against discrimination. The Czech Republic and Hungary have ratified various international agreements. However, the appearance of these in law and order of has often been delayed a few years and lacked the guarantee of procedure.

Affirmative measures or positive discrimination is one of the most debated issues. Even the result of an agreement reached over the need to introduce affirmative measures, - as the only solution of redressing the balance - may be surprisingly negative. Policies and practices in the favor of minorities and the involvement of minority representatives could be constructed in such a way that, deliberately or without, it is doomed to failure. The blame in these cases is put on the minority and securing the proof that nothing works for "them" effectively.

Radó, furthermore, has pointed out, that even the ideal state free of discrimination and exclusion would not change the situation of Roma, since the inequality of individuals and groups result from inequality in the past. "From the point of view of the Roma this means, that as long as they are the victims of past inequalities – resulting mainly from exclusion by the majority – they will never obtain equal chances."

A list of examples of discrimination can be found in both of the countries examined. The number of racially motivated attacks against Roma has increased dramatically since 1989. A detailed overview of analysis of the Czech law, in view of recourse of racism and discrimination, is provided in the Report of the Czech Helsinki Committee on the Status of Human Rights Protection in 1998. The Roma Rights newsletter also includes a list of racist attacks and violence in the past few years, the implications of which are to be felt in the region even today

The case of Hungary is quite interesting. On one hand, the constitutional obligation to have minority representation in the parliament has not been solved for the last 10 years – the Roma who have been members of parliament were elected on party lists and not as ethnic representatives. On the other hand, this is the only country where ethnic local self-governments do exist. The Act on the rights of National and Ethnic Minorities, passed by the National Assembly in 1993, meant, that in a democratic framework ethnic and cultural differences could be expressed openly, allowing the genuine organizations of minority to enter civil society. In the financial support of the minorities an office for National Ethnic and Minority has been established in 1994. In the following year the Public Foundation for the Gypsy Minority in Hungary was established. At the beginning of 1996, by the setting up of the Primer Gypsy Cabinet the political connotations of the question of the Roma have become stronger, overshadowing professional arguments. At present, instead of an overall concept, the Roma question depends on the personal negotiations of the Prime Minister and the leader of the National Gypsy Minority Self-Government. Ombudsman offices on minorities and data protection has also been established in order to protect Human Rights.

The Czech government formulated its policy towards minorities in the Conception of approach of the government towards the affairs of national minorities in the Czech republic in 1994 (Government resolution 63/ 1994). This document is not legally binding, but set the basic principles of the minority policy, the position of minorities and the protection of their rights. The Council for National Minorities of the Government of the Czech Republic was established in 1993. It has no executive power and is only an advisory body for the government. From September 1998 the Council belongs under the competence of the Government Commissioner for Human Rights, who is its chairperson. In October 1977 the so called Bratinka Report was adopted by the Czech Government, preparing a long term plan of action and leading to the establishment of the Interdepartmental Commission for Romani Affairs. One of the major plans was the establishment of Romani social advisors within district authorities. Another, concerning certain changes in the educational policies, was the introduction of Romani teacher assistants in schools. Most changes, however, have met enormous resistance on the part of bureaucrats in charge. The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe passed the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities on 10 November 1994. The Czech Republic signed this Convention in Strasbourg on 28 April 1995, and entered in effect on 1 February 1998.

In April 1999 the government adopted a new policy towards the Roma: the Policy of the Czech government towards the Romani community supporting their integration into society, which will hopefully serve as the starting point of long term and systematic changes. The draft concept of Government Policy towards Members of Romani Community facilitating their integration into the society includes a proposal to establish a Commission for Ethnic Equality, a very important step. The plan to introduce the Czech version of the affirmative action called "equalizing action", focuses mainly on education and emphasizes the importance of educating tolerance. The realization of the proposal is scheduled to take place between 2001-20.

One may conclude, that on the level of passing laws and establishing governmental institutions, both countries have shown advancement concerning the protection of national and ethnic minorities. Rights can be enforced under three conditions:

1. Strong political pressure. This is not the case at the moments, since the economical and social tension present in the countries in the process of change, does not enhance the growth of solidarity among its members. Contradicting political expectations often extinguish each other. The question of Romas could only be properly dealt with adapting long term programs. This, however, is extremely difficult to realize under the circumstances, in which the power relations change in every 4 year. This problem could be overcome by a strong legal system prescribing national obligations. However, such a strong system is hardy reconcilable with the tendency of weakening national role.

2. Strong international pressure. The intention of joining the EU is strong enough in both countries to accept international laws and norms. These norms, however, do not in themselves protect the rights of the Roma. and the enforcement and measurement of these laws is not guaranteed. As a common challenge, both Hungary and the Czech Republic have to meet the so called Coppenhagen Entry - a condition of EU membership - which includes Human Rights Protection.

3.Strong civil community and representation of the Roma. At the moment, the Roma civil organisations, despite of their growing number, are not strong enough. Due to their weak social position they do not represent the needs of the Roma adequately. The general civil society in our countries does not show solidarity with the discriminated. There are only a few non-Roma organizations dealing with the Roma questions with very limited resources and concentrating on the defined areas of the problem. Other social organizations (churches, trade unions) are not visibly active on this field.

In spite of the introduced legislative measures, it is clear that the labor market and the education are the basic areas where the integration of the Romani minority can be realized. At the moment the position of the majority and the minority is not equal in these fields. The disadvantage of the Romani minority is socially based. The cultural differences due to low education result in small chances for the Roma in the labor market. The situation can only be solved by the active policy of the state and other structures focusing on the chances of the Romani minority for educational chances.

3. Exclusion in the Education system

3/A Structural Changes

In the Czech Republic and Hungary the general aim of transformation and the intention of becoming part of the European Union have called for various responses in the field of education:

- The recognition of pupils, or the right of ’their parents’ to choose their educational path,

- The break up of the state monopoly on education by allowing the establishment of private and denominational schools,

- The decentralization of the education system and

- The depolitization of education.

"However many of the changes that have occurred in the economy and the society have widened the existing difference in access between children from different background." (UNICEF, 1998, p.61) I am convinced, that the free choice of schooling and even the decentralization, structural changes that can be considered positive, at the same time contribute to exclusion. Such changes – even if they provide more freedom – do not mean much without equal access. Furthermore, within the state schools the symptom of 'white flight' can be observed, meaning that those who can afford better schools, take out their children from local schools where the children of the poor (mostly Romas in both countries) are studying. Therefore, the most disadvantaged schools are those located in the economically most disadvantaged areas, working with the most disadvantaged students. The fact that most gypsy children begin their schooling in subsidiary shools ‘provided’ by the education system, is a visible form of discrimination.

3/B Datas

In Hungary a significant number (75.000) of the Roma children near school-age face segregation in schools. Fifty percent of children attending correctional schools for the mentally handicapped are Roma, most of them apparently without sound justification. Presently 36.547 child attends some special school, 30-50% of them are estimated to be Roma.. In several municipalities of Hungary the Roma children are obliged to attend separate so-called Gypsy schools or special classes within the normal primary school. The personnel and financial resources of schools with larger than the average number of Roma pupils are generally worse than those of other schools, and generally fewer classes are instructed by professionally trained teachers. There exist financial incentives for parents with children in special schools. In the current economic climate of Hungary, with 70% of Roma unemployed, such payments for special schooling belong to the mechanism of substandard schooling for the Roma. De facto segregation exist since the 1960’s when so called "C-class" category was created for the children of "socially deprived." In 1997 in 132 of the 840 normal schools surveyed by sociologist Péter Radó, there were separate classes predominantly of Roma. In 1996/97 only 7-8% of Roma children could attend normal primary schools, and only 3% of them could enter secondary education, which 1.5% would finish.

The same mechanism is relevant in the Czech Republic, where the estimated number of Roma children between the age of 4-18 is 67.000, of who approximately 62.5% attended special schools in 1997. The Czech data of 1990, which is considered to be relevant, despite the low number of Roma declaring their ethnicity, shows that 80-85% of the Romani population have basic education, mainly finished at special schools. As the ERRC report has pointed out, Roma parents send their children to special schools in order to receive a minimum level of education. 8.4% of Roma complete apprentice schools, 1.2% high schools, and 0.3% universities. 5% of the Romani population stays without any education. Therefore the core of integration lays in education as a prerequisite of the comparable position of the minority in other spheres of the life in the society.

In the table bellow I summarize the available data, knowing that the figures are not really comparable, due to the difference of their sources and measuring methods.

Hungary Czech Republic

Number of Roma children in the school age

75,000

67.000

Percentage of Roma children

in the special schools

30-50%

62.5%

Romas completing high school

1.5%

1.2%

4. Experiments for the integration of disadvantaged children into school

A summary of the strategies for the education of Roma in the Czech Republic and Hungary

Problems and Solutions

At present, the 1989 resolution of the European Council is the only legal means that treat the failure experienced in school. The decrees of the resolution identify the problem to the member countries, and provide practical measures against exclusion within school..These measures of growing importance include pre-school education, teacher training, the better profession orientation of pupils, and the establishment of contact with partners.

In the two countries examined, various laws and orders have been passed concerning the enforcement of the rights of the minority and the equalization of discrimination in schools.

4/A Minority Schooling

There are two levels of minority schooling:1. Members of the minority can learn about their own culture in their own language, meaning: learning in the mother tongue, bilingual education of minorities, follow up programs for Romas, and intercultural education. These are allowed in both countries. The differences on this field:

2. Members of the minority can learn every subject in their language

In Hungary schools may receive special quotas after each child who participates in ethnic programs, while this concept does not exists in the Czech Republic.

In the Czech Republic however, some Roma assistants are introduced to the education.

Problems:

  • Non of the countries provide mother tongue education for Roma children. The multicolored nature of the Gypsy language and its dialects, and the lack of its written form are two of the many reasons of the above statement.
  • Often the teachers are not prepared well enough for minority education, not to mention the issue of prejudice. Furthermore, the number of Roma teachers is limeted.

Textbooks, methodical and pedagogical programs are available in a very limited amount.

  • Minority programs in general are follow up courses for Roma students.
  • The Roma parents are suspicious about minority programs.
  • Only the elementary education of minorities is compulsory by law in Hungary. On the request of the families, in case there are at least 8 Roma students, the school is obliged to start a separate class. Due to financial shortages this initiative can not be met in most cases.
  • The schools reflect the cultural values of the middle-class. Concerning the measures of the minority programs, with special regard to those of the Roma students, there is a lot to be elucidated. As long as the whole teaching system does not reflect on intercultural relations and values of Human Rights, minority programs will not form coherent parts of the school curricula.
  • Concerning the quota system in Hungary, the schools receive normative support after the minority in order to maintain their minority education through the local governments. In reality, however, in most cases this does not mean more money for the school, as the local government redistributing its budget, at the same time reduces the basic financial support of the given school.
  • As to the Roma assistant initiatives in the Czech Republic, one might observe that the concept aims to help Roma children learn during lessons and to keep contact between the school and the Roma parents., However, as a consequence of the continuing lack of communication and systematic approach, and as a sign of the absence of integration policy of the Romani community, the position of Romani assistants has not been addressed satisfactorily. The financial background of such teaching assistants is still not stabilized.

Previous | Continue

LGI / Resources / Ethnic relations / Social exclusion in the education